 
	 GANDHI 
	SEVAGRAM 
		ASHRAM
	GANDHI 
	SEVAGRAM 
		ASHRAM
Written by :  M. K. Gandhi
Compiled and Edited by : Sailesh Kumar Bandopadhyaya
First Edition : 3,000 copies, November 1960
ISBN : 81-7229-223-6
Printed and Published by : Navajivan Mudranalaya, 
Ahemadabad-380014 
India
© Navajivan Trust, 1960
Bomb At The Prayer
Speaking after prayers on Wednesday evening, Gandhi referred to the 
previous day's bomb explosion in the Birla House compound. He had 
been receiving anxious enquiries and praise for being unruffled at 
the accident. He thought that it was military practice and, 
therefore, nothing to worry about. He had not realized till after 
the prayers that it was a bomb explosion and that the bomb was meant 
against him. God only knew how he would have behaved in front of a 
bomb aimed at him and exploding. Therefore, he deserved no praise. 
He would deserve a certificate only if he fell as a result of such 
an explosion and yet retained a smile on his face and no malice 
against the doer. What he wanted to say was that no one should look 
down upon the misguided youth who had thrown the bomb. He probably 
looked upon Gandhiji as an enemy of Hinduism. After all, has not the 
Gita said that whenever there was an evil-minded person damaging 
religion, God sent someone to put an end to his life? That 
celebrated verse has a special meaning. The youth should realize 
that those who differed from him were not necessarily evil. The evil 
had no life apart from the toleration of good people. No one should 
believe that he or she was so perfect that he or she was sent by God 
to punish evil-doers, as the accused seemed to flatter himself he 
was.
He (Gandhiji) had heard that the youth had without permission 
occupied a masjid for lack of other accommodation and now 
that the police were getting all mosques evacuated, he resented the 
act. It was a wrong thing on his part to have occupied the masjid 
in the first place and it was doubly wrong to defy the authorities, 
who asked him to vacate it.
Serving Hinduism
To those who were at the back of the youth, he would appeal to 
desist from such activity. That was not the way to save Hinduism. 
Hinduism could be saved only by Gandhiji's method. Gandhiji had 
practised Hinduism from early childhood. His nurse had taught him to 
invoke Rama when he feared evil spirits. Later on he had come in 
contact with Christians, Muslims and others and, after making a fair 
study of other religions, had stuck to Hinduism. He was as firm in 
his faith today as in his early childhood. He believed God would 
make him an instrument of saving the religion that he loved, 
cherished and practised. In any case, one had to have constant 
practice and acquaintance with the fundamentals of religion before 
being qualified for becoming God's instrument.
Pity The Bomb Thrower
He had told the Inspector General of Police also, not to harass him 
in any way. They should try to win him over and convert him to right 
thinking and doing. He hoped that the youth and his guides would 
realize their error. For, it was a wrong done to Hinduism and the 
country. At the same time Gandhiji warned his hearers against being 
angry with the accused. He did not know that he was doing anything 
wrong. They should pity him. If they harboured resentment against 
Gandhiji's fast and had still pledged themselves to maintain peace 
in order to save an old servant of the nation, the guilt was theirs, 
not that of the young man who had thrown the bomb. If, on the other 
hand, they had signed the Peace Pledge whole-heartedly, persons like 
the young man were ultimately bound to come to their way of 
thinking.
Gandhiji said that he expected the audience to go on with the 
prayers in spite of bomb explosions or a shower of bullets. He was 
glad to learn that a poor unlettered woman was the cause of the 
arrest of the miscreant. If the heart was sound, if there was right 
thought, lack of letters was not of any consequence. He 
congratulated the unlettered sister on her simple bravery.
Birla House, 
New Delhi, 
21-1-'48
Poverty No Shame
A difficulty to which his attention was drawn was that while the 
Congress had been in the wilderness it had set before the people the 
ideal of service, self-denial and simplicity. In those days it was 
difficult to collect even a lakh of rupees. Today, the Congress 
Government was in charge of crores of rupees and could raise as much 
as it liked. Were they to spend it as if there was no change from 
foreign rule to indigenous rule? Some people seemed to think that 
India's leaders and ambassadors must live and spend money in a style 
befitting their independent status and vie with independent America 
and England in stylishness. They thought that such expenditure was 
necessary in order to uphold India's prestige in foreign countries. 
Gandhiji did not think so. There was no merit in hiding our poverty. 
India's status in the world depended upon her moral supremacy which 
her passive resistance had brought her. In this she had no rival as 
yet, for the other nations, great or small, were proud of their 
armaments and military valour. That was their capital. India 
possessed only her moral capital, which increased with the spending. 
On any other condition the Congress claims to revolutionize values, 
when they came into power, would be forfeited. People criticized the 
Ministers for accepting high salaries and not bringing the 
artificial British standard down to the natural Indian standard. 
These critics knew nothing of the private life of their Ministers. 
But the fashion was for Congressmen and others to expect high 
emoluments wholly out of keeping with what one was making out of 
office.
One who managed to live on Rs. 150 per month would not hesitate to 
demand and expect Rs. 500. Such persons felt that they would not be 
appreciated unless they demanded high salaries and lived in the old 
Civil Service style and dressed up as such. That was not the way to 
serve India. They should not forget that a man's value did not 
depend upon the amount of money that he earned. The process of 
self-purification, which they all must share, demanded right thought 
and action.
Birla House, 
New Delhi, 
22-1-'48
How to Deal with Traitors
Gandhiji had received a telegram from Meerut. It said that they had no ill 
feelings against the Nationalist Muslims, but they did not believe 
that those League Muslims who, until yesterday, had been collecting 
arms and even now intended to help Pakistan, could ever be loyal to 
the Union. He (Gandhiji) would have to repent if he put his trust in 
them. They also said that religion and politics were quite separate 
and non-violence could never work in politics.
It was rather late in the day to tell him, he said, that 
non-violence could not work in politics. In politics they could not 
begin with distrust. Those in charge of the Government were men of 
great courage and self-sacrifice. They would deal with traitors when 
the occasion came. Traitors might be found in any community and not 
only among the Muslims. They had decided to live with the Muslims as 
brothers and he wanted them to stick to their resolve. All Leaguers 
were not bad. They should report against those who indulged in 
questionable activities and let the Government deal with them as 
severely as it liked. They must on no account take the law into 
their own hands. That would be barbarous.
Birla House, New Delhi, 23-1-'48
Independence Day
This day, 26th January, is Independence Day. This observance was 
quite appropriate when we were fighting for independence we had not 
seen nor handled. Now! We have handled it and we seem to be 
disillusioned. At least I am, even if you are not.
What are we celebrating today? Surely not our disillusionment. We 
are entitled to celebrate the hope that the worst is over and that 
we are on the road to showing the lowliest of the villager that it 
means his freedom from serfdom, and that he is no longer a serf born 
to serve the cities and towns of India but that he is destined to 
exploit the city dwellers for the advertisement of the finished 
fruits of well thought out labours, that he is the salt of the 
Indian earth, that it means also equality of all classes and creeds, 
never the domination and superiority of the major community over a 
minor, however insignificant it may be in number or influence. Let 
us not defer the hope and make the heart sick. Yet what are the 
strikes and a variety of lawlessness but a deferring of the hope? 
These are symptoms of our sickness and weakness. Let labour realize 
its dignity and strength. Capital has neither dignity nor strength 
compared to labour. These the man in the street also has. In a 
well-ordered democratic society there is no room, no occasion for 
lawlessness or strikes. In such a society there are ample lawful 
means for vindicating justice. Violence, veiled or unveiled, must be 
taboo. Strikes in Cawnpore, coal mines or elsewhere mean material 
loss to the whole society not excluding the strikers themselves. I 
need not be reminded that this declamation does not lie well in the 
mouth of one like me who has been responsible for so many successful 
strikes. If there be such critics they ought not to forget that then 
there was neither independence nor the kind of legislation we have 
now. I wonder if we can remain free from the fever of power politics 
or the bid for power which afflicts the political world, the East 
and the West. Before leaving this topic of the day, let us permit 
ourselves to hope that though geographically and politically India 
is divided into two, at heart we shall ever be friends and brothers 
helping and respecting one another and be one for the outside world.
Birla House, 
New Delhi, 
26-l-'48
Urs At Mehrauli
Gandhiji described his morning visit to the Dargah Sharif at Mehrauli. 
The urs had attracted a large concourse of Muslims and what 
gladdened Gandhiji was to find an equal number of Hindus and Sikhs. 
Due to some wild and misleading rumours, however, the attendance of 
Muslims was thinner than in the previous years. It was a matter of 
shame that man should have to be afraid of man. Gandhiji was also 
distressed to see the costly marble trellis damaged. It was no 
answer to say that similar or worse things had happened in Pakistan. 
Had we fallen so low as to stoop to such acts of vandalism? Granting 
that such incidents had occurred on a larger scale in Pakistan, it 
would be improper to institute comparisons in evil doing. Even if 
the whole world did wrong, should we do likewise? If today Gandhiji 
took to evil courses, would it not distress them? For him it would 
be worse than death. Similarly, they had reason to feel ashamed at 
the damage done to the Dajrgah. The friend in charge had 
related to the audience the history of the shrine and Gandhiji felt 
that it behoved them all to show to such a holy place the veneration 
due to it.
Birla House, 
New Delhi, 
2 7-1-'48
Satyagraha in South Africa
Gandhiji referred to the Satyagraha launched by the Indian community in South 
Africa. Indians in South Africa were not permitted free entry into 
the various provinces. In defence of their honour as men and women, 
the Satyagrahis had marched to Volkurst and then motored to 
Johannesburg where they held a meeting. This was a courageous step 
and if the people as a whole became Satyagrahis in the right spirit, 
victory was sure to crown their efforts. In the question of the 
march the Government had shown a degree of tolerance and not 
effected any arrests. But with the progress of the movement, it was 
feared that arrests would follow. So long, however, as the movement 
was conducted peacefully, there was no reason for the Government to 
resort to persecution. Why should whites consider it infra dig 
to talk matters over with non-whites? Gandhiji suggested that the 
authorities should contact the Satyagraha leaders and satisfy their 
reasonable demands. Today, India and Pakistan, just become new 
Dominions, were entitled to expect friendly treatment from sister 
Dominions of the Commonwealth. But if the South African Government 
still treated Indians as inferiors on the score of colour, he had no 
hesitation in declaring that they would be putting themselves in the 
wrong. It was unthinkable that Dominions should quarrel among 
themselves.
Birla House, 
New Delhi, 
28-1-'48
Their Servant
Gandhiji next spoke of a deputation of about forty refugees from Bannu, who 
had called on him in the afternoon. Poor men, they were in an 
afflicted state and he prized their darshan. As he had other 
engagements, they were good enough at his request to have their 
statements recorded by Shri Brijkrishna. One of them, however, 
exclaimed that they owed their miseries to him and angrily asked 
him to leave them alone and retire to the Himalayas. Gandhiji asked 
him at whose bidding he should go. Some were annoyed and a few went 
to the length of abusing him, while many eulogized his efforts. The 
only course, therefore, open to him was to follow the dictates of 
God who spoke to men in the inmost chamber of the heart. There were 
women too in the company. He regarded them as his brothers or 
sisters. God was our one true friend. We were entirely in His hands. 
He would not care to go and enjoy the peace of the mountains but 
would be content with what peace he could extract from the 
surrounding turmoil. He, therefore, preferred to stay in their 
midst, adding that if they all went to the Himalayas, he might 
follow them as their servant. 
Bread Labour
Proceeding Gandhiji referred to the complaints brought to him that 
the refugees, though provided with food, shelter and clothing, were 
averse to any work. If a man was in distress, the key to his 
happiness lay in labour. God did not create man to eat, drink and 
make merry. The Gita taught that one should perform yajna 
(bread labour) and partake of the fruits of that labour. 
Millionaires who ate without work were parasites. Even they should 
eat by the sweat of their brow or should go without food. The only 
permissible exception was the disabled for whom society provided. 
There was a variety of work for the refugees to do, such as 
maintaining sanitation including cleaning of latrines, spinning and 
other crafts. They should learn to make the best of the situation in 
which they found themselves.
Kisans
Gandhiji then spoke about peasants. If he had his say, our Governor-General 
and our Premier would be drawn from the Kisans. In his childhood he 
had learnt from school books that the Kisans were heirs to the 
kingdom of the earth. This applied to those who laboured on the 
land and ate from what they produced. Such Kisans to be worthy of 
high offices might be illiterate provided they had robust common 
sense, great personal bravery, unimpeachable integrity and 
patriotism above suspicion. As real producers of wealth, they were 
verily the masters while we had enslaved them. It had been suggested 
to Gandhiji that the higher secretariat posts should also be manned 
by Kisans. He would endorse this suggestion provided they were 
suitable and had knowledge of the work expected of them. When Kisans 
of this type were forthcoming, he would publicly ask ministers and 
others to make room for them.
Birla House, 
New Delhi, 
29-1-'48
Harijan, 
8-2-1948